Alfa awus036h driver windows 10 download
Leave a comment.Alfa AWUSH driver installation: Full instructions — Data Alliance Customer Service
· AWUSH Window 10 Installation Guide ** Before Plug-in AWUSH, insert the ALFA driver DVD into DVD-ROM or download the AWUSH windows 7 from ALFA download website ** 1. After plug-in AWUSH, go to device manager (type device manger in search bar) You will find the RTL_Wireless in the Other devices list · Note that we do not advertise or promote the use of AWUSH on Windows We have better and faster options available for purchase such as the newer AWUSNH and AWUSACH. But if you already own an AWUSH and find yourself wanting to use it on Windows 10, here is a quick way how to do it. The last driver made for this item was December of for Windows 7. The . Chipset: Realtek RTLL: Standards: Wireless IEEE b/g USB standard: Data Rate: b: 11 Mbps g: 54 Mpbs: OS Supported: Windows XP, Windows Vista Торговая марка: ALFA Network Inc.
Alfa awus036h driver windows 10 download.AWUSNH (EOL) – ALFA Network Inc.
· AWUSAC, AWUSEAC, AWUSACH Windows 10 Installation Guide 1. Download Windows 10 driver and Alfa WiFi Scanner from this Link For example here save the unzip Windows 10 driver and Alfa WiFi Scanner at Desktop 2. Open the Alfa 10 folder and click «Setup» 4. Follow the Setup procedure 5. After finish the setup, click «AlfaWiFiScanner» or use. · Note that we do not advertise or promote the use of AWUSH on Windows We have better and faster options available for purchase such as the newer AWUSNH and AWUSACH. But if you already own an AWUSH and find yourself wanting to use it on Windows 10, here is a quick way how to do it. The last driver made for this item was December of for Windows 7. The . Alfa AWUSH not compatible with Windows 8 (regular or Tablet versions) Beware of fake / counterfeit versions of Alfa AWUSH Alfa USB adapters based on RealTek RT chipset: Driver not available for any future operating systems.
Using Alfa AWUS036H on Windows 10
awus036h alfa drivers
AWUSH (EOL) – ALFA Network Inc.
Windows 10 Drivers for Alfa AWUSH — Microsoft Community
Best Thermal Pastes Determined in 2021
Tom’s Hardware has published a review showing the results of testing 90 different thermal interfaces for central processors. Based on the research results, the most effective solutions were selected in each of four categories: the best expensive thermal paste; the best inexpensive thermal paste; the best thermal interface based on liquid metal; best budget liquid metal thermal interface.
Image source: Tom’s Hardware
To eliminate the influence of external factors, testing of thermal interfaces was carried out using the same computer components. In particular, a ten-core Intel i9-10850K was used, overclocked across all ten cores up to 4.6 GHz at a voltage of 1.190 V, an MSI Z490 MEG Godlike motherboard, 16 GB of DDR4-3600 RAM and a Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti video card.
For a more complete assessment of the effectiveness of a particular thermal paste, the resource tested each of the samples participating in the test three times:
Based on the testing results, the following leaders were selected.
ProlimaTech PK-3 Nano Aluminum
ProlimaTech PK-3 Nano Aluminum, which is composed of aluminum oxide and zinc, took first place in the category «Best Premium Regular Thermal Paste». At $ 3.60 per gram, this non-conductive, moderately viscous thermal paste has a thermal conductivity of 11.2 W / (m K). Among the advantages of the thermal interface, the resource highlighted its stability — the composition does not lose its properties over time. In addition, the paste is easy to apply and remove from the processor cover.
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut got the second place in the category of expensive thermal pastes. This thermal paste is also non-conductive and has a thermal conductivity of 12.5 W / (m K). This moderately viscous thermal interface is easy to apply and remove, and does not lose its properties for a long time. The only drawback of this sample is its price. Offer price — $ 9.99 per gram of thermal paste.
Noctua NT-H1 is the best in the category of inexpensive thermal pastes according to the results of tests by Tom’s Hardware. It is non-conductive, has a relatively viscous and stable composition that is easy to apply and remove. The paste is supplied in a small syringe with a screw cap that preserves the durability of the composition. For most assemblies, this thermal grease is an excellent choice. Its cost is $ 2.26 per gram.
Second place in this category went to Gelid GC-Extreme thermal grease at $ 3.70 per gram. Its thermal conductivity coefficient is 8.5 W / (m K). This thermal grease has a moderately viscous composition, which allows it to be evenly distributed over the entire area of the processor cover. As a disadvantage of this thermal interface, the resource highlighted the feature of applying thermal paste. To do everything right, you need to very slowly push on the syringe plunger. Thermal paste is easily wiped off the surface of the CPU or cooler.
Moving on to the category «the best expensive liquid metal-based thermal interfaces». As a rule, due to their high thermal conductivity, such solutions are used to cool processors undergoing extreme overclocking, providing the best heat transfer coefficient from the hot processor cover to the base of the cooling system. At the same time, they have a number of serious drawbacks: they conduct current, which creates the risk of damage to other elements of the computer system, it is very difficult to apply them correctly. And also, usually the cost of such thermal interfaces is much higher than that of conventional thermal pastes.
Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
The first place in this category was given to the thermal interface based on liquid metal Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut. Its thermal conductivity coefficient is 73.0 W / (m K). It is easy to clean, but requires very great care in its application. For this, a syringe with a tip in the form of a capillary needle-applicator is used. Excess applied composition can be removed using the extraction tip by pulling the syringe plunger upwards. Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut proved to be the most effective of all tested liquid metal thermal interfaces. However, you will have to fork out for it. The cost of one gram of substance is $ 22.99.
CoolLaboratory Liquid Pro
The second place in the category of premium thermal interfaces based on liquid metal was awarded to CoolLaboratory Liquid Pro. Its thermal conductivity coefficient is 79.0 W / (m K). Cost — $ 25 per gram. This thermal interface is also applied to the processor cover using a syringe with a capillary needle tip. The kit also includes a sponge for cleaning excess liquid metal and an alcohol-impregnated swab to prepare the site for applying the thermal interface. Application of formulation is facilitated by using cotton swabs to spread over the entire processor lid with moderate pressure. It should be remembered that the liquid metal thermal interface reacts with some types of metals, for example, aluminum. Some users of this solution have also noted a chemical reaction with copper.
Phobya Liquid Metal Compound LM
Phobya Liquid Metal Compound LM won in the category «Best Low-Cost Liquid Metal Thermal Interface». The manufacturer does not indicate the coefficient of its thermal conductivity, however, Tom’s Hardware notes the high efficiency of this solution. At more than half the price of the most expensive liquid metal interfaces on this list, the performance of the Phobya Liquid Metal Compound LM impressed reviewers. In some cases, the composition turned out to be even more effective than CoolLaboratory Liquid Pro and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut. The cost of the composition is $ 9.00 per gram of substance.
Like the contestants above, Phobya Liquid Metal Compound LM is applied to the processor cover using a syringe with an applicator needle and then evenly spread over the area using a cotton pad. May enter into a destructive reaction with aluminum and other metals.
The effectiveness of each of the above thermal interface can be estimated in the diagrams provided by Tom’s Hardware. Tests were carried out in the Prime95 app. In the first case, the efficiency of thermal interfaces was tested using the Noctua NH-D15 air processor cooler with a low pressure to the processor heat-distribution cover. The results are as follows:
The second test was carried out with the same cooler, but with a large pressure on the heat-distribution cover of the processor. The results are as follows:
In the third test, the EK AIO Elite 360 liquid cooling system was used with a large pressure to the processor cover:
The resource also cited the results of tests of the effectiveness of other thermal interfaces, which were carried out earlier. You can see them in the gallery below.
Thermal interface efficiency tables
View all images (3)